<aside>
</aside>
This rule fights 2 cognitive biases at once. the first is sunk cost (arkes and blumer, 1985). students keep pouring hours into a failing course because they've already invested so much. the dangerous part: research shows conscientious students, exactly the profile of most engineering majors, are the MOST vulnerable to this bias. if you're someone who tries hard, you're more at risk, not less. the second is the planning fallacy. you'll genuinely believe you can score 94% on everything remaining because your "realistic" predictions are statistically identical to your best-case scenarios.
running the actual arithmetic short-circuits both biases by making the impossibility explicit before emotion takes over. it's not about giving up. it's about not bleeding hours into a course where every hour now produces almost no return, while another course is sitting there where the same hour could move you a full letter grade.
When the course applies a significant curve. a 45% on a midterm with a 38% class average puts you above the median. always check the class distribution before running the stop-loss calculation.